Compare
IRAME vs Fieldguide
Fieldguide is an agentic platform built mainly for audit and advisory firms, with a version for internal audit teams. IRAME is built for the company's own internal audit and finance teams. IRA, IRAME's AI auditor, tests each control on every transaction and routes each exception to an owner.
A check means the capability is offered or stated. A minus means it is not offered, or not stated on the pages we checked.
| Capability | IRAME | Fieldguide |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Yes. Internal audit, SOX and ICOFR testing, continuous controls monitoring and an agentic CFO suite | Yes. Audit and advisory firms, plus internal audit and federal teams |
| Financial statement audit for firms | No, or not stated. IRAME is used by the company. It keeps evidence an external auditor can re-perform. | Yes. Agents for every phase of a financial audit, including drafting financial statements and disclosures |
| SOX and ITGC testing | Yes. SOX 302 and 404 and ICOFR key-control testing | Yes. SOX, ITGC testing and operational audits for internal audit teams |
| How tests run | Yes. IRA tests each control on the transaction data | Yes. Field Agents run control testing from evidence collection to cited conclusions, with a pause for practitioner judgment |
| Full-population testing | Yes. Each control is tested on every transaction | No, or not stated. Not stated on the pages we checked. Population and sampling are listed as test steps. |
| Exceptions routed to owners | Yes. Action Hub routes each exception and tracks it to closure | No, or not stated. Not stated on the pages we checked. Status is tracked across every audit and control. |
| Named data connections | Yes. SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Excel, CSV, PDFs and scans, email archives (PST) | No, or not stated. Not stated on the pages we checked. Trial balance ingestion and Word, Excel and PDF files are described. |
| AI in finance operations | Yes. IRA for AP control, AR and revenue assurance, and reconciliation is live | No, or not stated. Not stated on the pages we checked |
| Deployment | Yes. IRAME's cloud, your own cloud tenancy or on-premise | Yes. Hosted on AWS in US data centers |
Checked Nov 7, 2026. The Fieldguide column uses only what these public pages said on that date: fieldguide.com, Audit & Assurance, Internal Audit, Trust. Spotted something out of date? Email sales@irame.ai and we will correct it.
Where Fieldguide is strong
- Agents for each stage of an engagement: planning, testing, review, financial statements and sign-off.
- Agents follow the firm's own audit methodology.
- Fieldguide says more than half of the top 100 firms partner with it.
- ISO 42001, SOC 2 Type II and AIUC-1 listed on its trust page.
Which one fits your team
Choose Fieldguide if
- You are an audit or advisory firm running client engagements.
- You need financial statement drafting and disclosures tied to audit workpapers.
- You co-source internal audit with an accounting firm and want one shared workspace.
Choose IRAME if
- You are the company and want each control tested on every transaction from your own ERP data.
- Exceptions need an owner in the business and a tracked outcome.
- You need it to run in your own cloud tenancy or on-premise.
Questions about IRAME and Fieldguide
Who is Fieldguide for?
IRAME's review of Fieldguide's public pages found it is built mainly for audit and advisory firms. Fieldguide also offers a version for corporate internal audit teams covering SOX, ITGC testing and operational audits.
Does Fieldguide test the full population?
IRAME tests each control on every transaction. Fieldguide's audit page lists population, sampling, extraction and evaluation as steps its Field Auditor agent runs. The pages we checked do not say whether tests cover full populations.
Can an audit firm on Fieldguide rely on IRAME's results?
Yes. IRAME keeps the data, control and result of each run, so an external auditor can re-perform the test on whatever platform it uses, including Fieldguide.
Other comparisons
Compare
IRAME vs ChatGPT
A general AI assistant, compared with a saved control that re-runs and keeps its evidence.
Learn moreCompare
IRAME vs traditional GRC tools
Registers and sign-off workflows, compared with control tests run on every transaction.
Learn moreCompare
IRAME vs Optro
A broad GRC platform with AI agents, compared with testing every transaction from ERP data.
Learn moreCompare
IRAME vs Workiva
A reporting and GRC platform, compared with control tests run on every transaction.
Learn moreCompare
IRAME vs Diligent
Board software and GRC with ACL Analytics, compared with plain-language controls tested in full.
Learn moreCompare
IRAME vs MindBridge
Risk-ranked anomaly detection, compared with named controls tested and routed to owners.
Learn moreCompare
IRAME vs FloQast
A close and compliance platform with AI agents, compared with control tests run on every transaction.
Learn moreCompare
IRAME vs BlackLine
A financial close and operations platform with AI agents, compared with control tests run on every transaction.
Learn moreCompare
IRAME vs Andera
An AI auditor that works from uploaded evidence, compared with saved controls run on every transaction.
Learn moreNew to the terms? Read the audit and controls glossary.
Stop sampling. Let IRA test everything.
Bring one process. In 30 minutes we show you the exceptions IRA finds and the evidence behind each one.