Glossary

Control deficiency

A control deficiency exists when a control's design or operation does not let staff prevent or detect misstatements on time.

Why Control deficiency matters to internal audit and controllers

A design deficiency means the control would miss the problem even if it ran as intended. An operating deficiency means a well-designed control was not performed as designed.

Under SOX and PCAOB AS 2201, deficiencies are graded. A significant deficiency merits the audit committee's attention. A material weakness is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement will not be prevented or detected on time, and it must be disclosed.

An exception is not automatically a deficiency. The team weighs its cause and frequency first.

Grading matters. Too harsh, and the audit committee loses trust. Too soft, and the external auditor may disagree.

An example

A control says the controller reviews every manual journal above a set amount. Testing finds that journals posted by the controller are also approved by the controller. The review exists but cannot work for those journals. That is a design deficiency.

How IRAME handles it

IRA, IRAME's AI auditor, classifies each exception as a true exception, business as usual or a false positive. True exceptions are marked as a design deficiency or procedural non-compliance; your team decides the severity. Reports set out each as Finding, Impact, Risk and Recommendation.

See SOX and ICFR testing

Stop sampling. Let IRA test everything.

Bring one process. In 30 minutes we show you the exceptions IRA finds and the evidence behind each one.

Talk to sales